John Kassel Representing Group of SC Residents Suing Governor McMasterJohn Kassel of Kassel McVey along with attorneys Adam Protheroeand Susan B. Berkowitz are representing a group of unnamed plaintiffs suing the governor of South Carolina and the head of the state’s Department of Employment in Workforce, claiming they forfeited more than half a billion dollars in benefits that would have otherwise gone to hard-hit residents.

The lawsuit was filed on Wednesday in the Court of Common Pleas in the Fifth Judicial Circuit and accuses Governor Henry McMaster and DEW Director G. Daniel Ellzey of working against the best interests of South Carolinians.

“South Carolina law requires the South Carolina Department of Employment and Workforce (“DEW”) to act as necessary to secure all benefits available under the Social Security Act, like the enhanced unemployment benefits at issue in this case, for the benefit of the State of South Carolina and her citizens,” the lawsuit said. “Defendants’ actions are plainly contrary to this statutory obligation.”

Governor McMaster’s decision to drop the benefits came months ahead of the September expiration date with the hope of helping the state’s many businesses fill vacant positions.

But the plaintiffs in Wednesday’s lawsuit, identified only by their initials due to the sensitive information involved and fear of retaliation, said the decision to end Pandemic Unemployment Benefits by June 30 actually caused irreparable harm.

“As a result of Defendants’ premature termination of these benefits, Plaintiffs have each suffered and will continue to suffer, hardships related to the loss or reduction of their Unemployment Insurance benefits,” the lawsuit said.

The suit goes on to claim that, while recovery is underway, “it is incomplete” with “thousands of South Carolina families” still struggling to recover financially.

“South Carolinians received over $39,000,000 less in Pandemic Unemployment Benefits between July 4, 2021, and July 10, 2021, than they did the week before Defendants’ decision to opt-out of those benefits took effect,” the lawsuit continued. “This weekly loss will most likely increase as Defendants’ decision takes full effect.”

Through the lawsuit, the plaintiffs are asking a court to require Director Ellzey to enter into a new agreement with the Department of Labor to administer pandemic unemployment benefits and require him to provide all South Carolinians who were receiving them with a notice of reinstatement.

They also want him to pay “prospective and retroactive” Pandemic Emergency Unemployment Compensation and Federal Pandemic Unemployment Compensation to all South Carolinians who qualify – or would have qualified for them had DEW not withdrawn.

Finally, they ask that neither McMaster nor Ellzey – nor those acting on their behalf – be allowed to pull South Carolina out of pandemic unemployment benefits or preventing residents from receiving theirs.

The suit lists attorneys John Kassel, Adam Protheroeand Susan B. Berkowitz as representing the plaintiffs. It also lists South Carolina Appleseed Legal Justice Center which describes itself as a forceful and respected advocate for low-income South Carolinians on issues such as health care, immigration, reentry issues, housing, education, hunger, public benefits, domestic violence, and consumer issues.


Awards & Memberships

Awards & Memberships

Kassel McVey
Personal Injury Lawyers
1330 Laurel Street Columbia, SC 29201 Phone: 803-256-4242

Mailing Address
Post Office Box 1476
Columbia, South Carolina 29202

Toll Free: (855) 256-4242
Fax: (803) 256-1952

Copyright © 2023 John D. Kassel, Attorney at Law, LLC. All rights reserved.  Privacy Policy  I  Terms of ServiceDisclaimer
This website is designed for general information only. The information should not be construed to constitute formal legal advice or the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. The results and testimonials listed on this website are specific to the facts and legal circumstances of specific cases and should not be used to form an expectation that the same results could be obtained for other clients in similar matters. This list is not a description or characterization of the quality of the firm's representation, it is not intended to compare one attorney's work to another and is in no way a guarantee of a specific result for your case.